AI Risk Wire

Risks

Consumer detriment and unsuitable advice

AI advice, sales or decisions leave customers worse off, or exploit those who are vulnerable.

NIST AI 600-1 · No exact NIST AI 600-1 categoryFCA Mills Review (2026)EU AI Act Art. 5(1)(b)

3incidents (primary) · 4 more as secondary
0read for controls · 3 not yet
1fixes reported
1repeats after a fix

Incidents per month

3 so far in 2026; 0 in the same span of 2025.

Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 11Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 11Aug 2026: 0Sep 2026: 0Oct 2026: 11Nov 2026: 0 Jan 26FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovto date

Developers

OpenAI · 3

Where the chain broke

Part of the systemIncidents where the control was not effective or did not existIncidents where the control was effectiveIncidents where sources don't mention the controlIncidents not yet checked for controls
L1 Model
Model provider
3
L2 Harness
Agent framework vendor
3
L3 Application
Deployer
3
L4 Infrastructure / target
Organisation hit
3

Controls for this risk, by layer

ControlIncidents where the control was not effective or did not existIncidents where the control was effectiveIncidents where sources don't mention the controlMost common reason it was not effective
Human approval for high-impact actions
L3 Application
People told they are dealing with AI
L3 Application
Route to a person and opt-out
L3 Application
Suitability and vulnerable-customer checks
L3 Application
Risk assessment per deployment
L3 Application
Grounding and fact checks
L3 Application

6 of 6 controls for this risk not yet recorded as effective.

Fixes reported and what followed

IncidentControl added by the fixIncidents after the fix
LR-2026-0556 2026-05-12 · OpenAI
Fix reported
Not tied to a controlLR-2026-0623

Incidents

EffectiveNot effectiveNot effective (bypassed)Did not existNot stated in sourcesNot yet checkedAttacker's ownOrder: model · harness · application · target

Also under this risk as a secondary risk: LR-2026-0193, LR-2026-0546, LR-2026-0560, LR-2026-0666