Levels crossed
Which provider statements say a capability level was crossed, not crossed or not determined?
138 rows, one per model version, domain and level; 13 match the choice below. Grouped by model, newest first.
GPT-Image-2.5-Flare OpenAI · 8 September 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · High · Stated as not crossed
The results indicate that neither GPT-Image-2.5-Sunburst nor GPT-Image- 2.5-Flare cross the Bio High threshold or the Cyber High threshold.
OpenAI · 8 September 2026 · Read the source
Gemini 3.7 Flash Google DeepMind
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · CCL (Critical Capability Level) · Stated as not crossed
Gemini 3.7 Flash reaches the alert threshold for this CCL, but not the CCL.
Google DeepMind · 13 August 2026 · Read the source
Muse Spark 1.1 Meta
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · Moderate or lower · Stated as not crossed
Therefore, we conclude that we have addressed these risks from unmitigated Muse Spark 1.1, which bring the residual risk to the “moderate or lower” risk threshold under Advanced AI Scaling Framework.
Meta · 9 July 2026 · Read the source
Muse Spark Contemplating Meta
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · Moderate or lower · Stated as not crossed
We assess cybersecurity risk as “moderate or lower” with respect to the threat scenarios outlined in Meta’s Advanced AI Scaling Framework.
Meta · 3 June 2026 · Read the source
Muse Spark Meta
2 statements · not crossed 2
- Cyber · Below the level required to meaningfully enable the cyber threat scenarios defin · Stated as not crossed
Muse Spark’s offensive cyber capabilities remain below the level required to meaningfully enable the cyber threat scenarios defined in the Advanced AI Scaling Framework.
Meta · 26 May 2026 · Read the source - Cyber · Moderate or lower · Stated as not crossed
We assess cybersecurity risk as “moderate or lower” with respect to the threat scenarios outlined in Meta’s Advanced AI Scaling Framework.
Meta · 26 May 2026 · Read the source
GPT-5.5 OpenAI · 23 April 2026
2 statements · not crossed 2
- Cyber · Critical · Stated as not crossed
We therefore treat VulnLMP as important evidence that GPT-5.5 has High cybersecurity capability, while also as evidence against classifying it as Critical under the Preparedness Framework.
OpenAI · 23 April 2026 · Read the source - Cyber · High capability, below critical · Stated as not crossed
we are treating GPT-5.5 as High capability in the Cybersecurity domain, but below Critical.
OpenAI · 23 April 2026 · Read the source
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google DeepMind
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · Uplift level 1 · Stated as not crossed
As previous models passed the alert threshold for cyber, we performed more additional testing in this domain on Gemini 3.1 Pro with and without Deep Think mode, and found that the model remains below the cyber CCL.
Google DeepMind · 19 February 2026 · Read the source
GPT-5 OpenAI
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · High cyber risk · Stated as not crossed
The gpt-5 model series does not meet the threshold for high cyber risk.
OpenAI · 13 August 2025 · Read the source
Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · ASL-4 · Stated as not crossed
Since Claude Opus 4.1 is deployed with ASL-3 protections, we focused on confirming it remains well below ASL-4 thresholds across CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear), cyber, and autonomy domains.
Anthropic · August 2025 · Read the source
o3 OpenAI · 16 April 2025
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · High · Stated as not crossed
openai’s safety advisory group (sag) reviewed the results of our preparedness evaluations and determined that openai o3 and o4-mini do not reach the high threshold in any of our three tracked categories: biological and chemical capability, cybersecurity, and ai self-improvement.
OpenAI · 16 April 2025 · Read the source
o4-mini OpenAI · 16 April 2025
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Cyber · High · Stated as not crossed
openai’s safety advisory group (sag) reviewed the results of our preparedness evaluations and determined that openai o3 and o4-mini do not reach the high threshold in any of our three tracked categories: biological and chemical capability, cybersecurity, and ai self-improvement.
OpenAI · 16 April 2025 · Read the source
Abbreviations in these level names
- CCL: Critical Capability Level
- A capability level at which, without safeguards, a model may pose a heightened risk of severe harm.
capability thresholds called “critical capability levels (ccls).” these are capability levels at which, absent mitigation measures, frontier ai models or systems may pose heightened risk of severe harm.
Google DeepMind · Read the source - ASL: AI Safety Level
- A graded set of safety and security measures that become stricter as model capabilities increase.
we use AI Safety Level Standards (ASL Standards), graduated sets of safety and security measures that become more stringent as model capabilities increase.
Anthropic · Read the source
Not listed: 96 more stored statements that do not, on their own, state a level for one model version (for example a definition of a level, a sentence about another model, or text damaged in our copy of the document).
A row is one model version, one domain and one level. The 138 rows quote 121 different sentences. We count a sentence once by its exact text, even where it fills several rows or appears under several versions. 8 stored rows state a level already listed for the same version and domain under another name or in another sentence; each is listed under that row and not counted again.
Some documents we hold are stored in lower case only, so their quotes are shown in lower case. The source link opens the original.