AI Risk Wire

OpenAI

OpenAI has 33 model versions on record; 18 have at least one documented fact.

Of the 18 versions listed below, 18 document a published framework; 12 document threshold determinations; 7 document tests by an independent or government party; 14 document tests the provider ran itself; 3 document safeguards the provider describes.

Model versions with documented facts

ModelWhat is documented
GPT-6.1 Sol · Released 29 September 2026 · 1 document
GPT-Image-2.5-Flare · Released 8 September 2026 · 1 document
GPT-6 Astra · Released 3 September 2026 · 12 documents
GPT-6 Sol · Released 3 September 2026 · 1 document
GPT-5.6 Luna · Released 9 July 2026 · 1 document
GPT-5.6 Sol · Released 9 July 2026 · 18 documents
GPT-5.6 Terra · Released 9 July 2026 · 2 documents
GPT-Rosalind-5.5 · Released 3 June 2026 · 1 document
GPT-5.5 Instant · System card dated 4 May 2026 · 1 document
GPT-5.5 · Released 23 April 2026 · 19 documents
GPT-5.5 Pro · Released 23 April 2026 · 2 documents
GPT-5.4 Thinking · Released 5 March 2026 · 1 document
GPT-5.4 mini · Released 5 March 2026 · 6 documents
GPT-5.3-Codex · Released 5 February 2026 · 2 documents
GPT-5 · System card dated 13 August 2025 · 14 documents
o3 · Released 16 April 2025 · 7 documents
o4-mini · Released 16 April 2025 · 2 documents
Operator · Released 23 January 2025 · 1 document

No document we read states a capability level, a test or a safeguard for: ChatGPT Images 2.5, GPT-5.6 Sol (Preview), GPT-6 Luna (October), GPT-6 Sol (October), GPT-Live-1.1, GPT-Live-1.1 Quip. GPT-Image-2.5-Sunburst, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-Live-1, GPT-Live-1 mini, ChatGPT Images 2.0, ChatGPT Images 2.0 Thinking, GPT-5.3 Instant, GPT-5.6 Luna (August), GPT-5.6 Sol (August): their documents report tests only as table rows or lines that do not name the version on their own; each page links the documents.

Framework

2 of 2 framework documents listed here are stored as "proposed": a model read their level names and no person has confirmed them.

Each test and safeguard, by who documents it

For each item, how many of the 18 versions listed above whose documents we read in full have it from an outside party (an independent or government tester), from the provider, or as a claim we could not confirm.

No document we read states, for any of these versions: Serious-incident disclosure commitment; Agent permission limits and sandboxing; Human approval for high-risk actions; Misuse monitoring and enforcement; Reasoning (chain-of-thought) monitoring; Staged or restricted access; Output provenance and watermarking; Telemetry and audit logging; Domain-specific safeguards (CBRN or cyber); Vulnerability disclosure and bug-bounty programme; Third-party or government red-team access during development.