Levels crossed
Which provider statements say a capability level was crossed, not crossed or not determined?
138 rows, one per model version, domain and level; 41 match the choice below. Grouped by model, newest first.
GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI
2 statements · not crossed 2
- Autonomy & replication · Below high capability · Stated as not crossed
GPT-5.5 Instant is considered below High Capability.
OpenAI · 4 May 2026 · Read the source - Autonomy & replication · High · Stated as not crossed
For AI Self-Improvement, evaluations of final checkpoints indicate that, like its predecessor models, GPT-5.5 Instant does not have a plausible chance of reaching a High threshold.
OpenAI · 4 May 2026 · Read the source
GPT-5.5 OpenAI · 23 April 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · High · Stated as not crossed
For AI self-improvement, evaluations of final checkpoints indicate that, like its predecessor models, GPT-5.5 does not have a plausible chance of reaching a High threshold.
OpenAI · 23 April 2026 · Read the sourceThe same level is stated in 1 other sentence, counted once. Show it.
GPT-5.5 did not meet our thresholds for High capability in AI Self-Improvement.
OpenAI · 23 April 2026 · Read the source
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic · 16 April 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · Automated AI R&D · Stated as not crossed
that Opus 4.7 does not cross the threshold for automated AI R&D;
Anthropic · 16 April 2026 · Read the sourceThe same level is stated in 2 other sentences, counted once. Show them.
We assess that Claude Opus 4.7 does not cross the automated AI-R&D capability threshold.
Anthropic · 16 April 2026 · Read the sourcethat Opus 4.7 does not cross the threshold for automated AI R&D; and that misalignment risk remains very low (though higher than for pre-Mythos Preview models).
Anthropic · 16 April 2026 · Read the source
Claude Mythos Preview Anthropic · 7 April 2026
3 statements · not crossed 3
- Autonomy & replication · AI R&D rule-out · Stated as not crossed
The main reason we have determined that Claude Mythos Preview does not cross the threshold in question is that we have been using it extensively in the course of our day-to-day work and exploring where it can automate such work, and it does not seem close to being able to substitute for Research Scientists and Research Engineers—especially relatively senior ones.
7 April 2026 · Read the source - Autonomy & replication · Automated AI R&D · Stated as not crossed
We assess that Claude Mythos Preview does not cross the automated AI-R&D capability threshold.
Anthropic · 7 April 2026 · Read the source - Autonomy & replication · RSP automated AI R&D · Stated as not crossed
we have concluded that Claude Mythos Preview does not cross the RSP automated AI R&D threshold of compressing two years of progress into one.
Anthropic · 7 April 2026 · Read the source
GPT-5.4 Thinking OpenAI · 5 March 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · High · Stated as not crossed
For AI self-improvement, evaluations of final checkpoints indicate that, like its predecessor models, gpt-5.4-thinking does not have a plausible chance of reaching a High threshold.
OpenAI · 5 March 2026 · Read the source
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic · 17 February 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · AI R&D-4 · Stated as not crossed
Our determination is that Claude Sonnet 4.6 does not cross either the AI R&D-4 or the CBRN-4 capability threshold.
Anthropic · 17 February 2026 · Read the source
Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic
2 statements · not crossed 1 · not determined 1
- Autonomy & replication · AI R&D-4 · Stated as not crossed
Our determination is that Claude Opus 4.6 does not cross either the AI R&D-4 or the CBRN-4 capability threshold.
Anthropic · 5 February 2026 · Read the source - Autonomy & replication · ASL-4 · Not determined
For AI R&D capabilities, we found that Claude Opus 4.6 has saturated most of our automated evaluations, meaning they no longer provide useful evidence for ruling out ASL-4 level autonomy.
Anthropic · 5 February 2026 · Read the source
GPT-5.3-Codex OpenAI · 5 February 2026
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · High · Stated as not crossed
It does not reach High capability on AI self-improvement.
OpenAI · 5 February 2026 · Read the source
Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · AI R&D-4 · Stated as not crossed
Our determination is that Claude Opus 4.5 does not cross either the AI R&D-4 or CBRN-4 capability threshold.
Anthropic · November 2025 · Read the source
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · ASL-3 · Stated as not crossed
Our evaluation results showed that Claude Haiku 4.5 remained well below ASL-3 thresholds across all domains of concern.
Anthropic · October 2025 · Read the source
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic
2 statements · not crossed 1 · not determined 1
- Autonomy & replication · AI R&D-4 · Stated as not crossed
All models tested remain below our pre-committed rule-out threshold of 0.6.
Anthropic · September 2025 · Read the source - Autonomy & replication · ASL-3 · Not determined
Exhibited improved autonomy capabilities in software engineering and AI research tasks, though still below the ASL-4 rule-out threshold.
Anthropic · September 2025 · Read the source
Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic
1 statement · not crossed 1
- Autonomy & replication · ASL-4 · Stated as not crossed
Since Claude Opus 4.1 is deployed with ASL-3 protections, we focused on confirming it remains well below ASL-4 thresholds across CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear), cyber, and autonomy domains.
Anthropic · August 2025 · Read the source
Models page 2 of 3 · previous · next
Abbreviations in these level names
- CCL: Critical Capability Level
- A capability level at which, without safeguards, a model may pose a heightened risk of severe harm.
capability thresholds called “critical capability levels (ccls).” these are capability levels at which, absent mitigation measures, frontier ai models or systems may pose heightened risk of severe harm.
Google DeepMind · Read the source - TCL: Tracked Capability Level
- A capability level for significant risks that may appear at a lower capability than a Critical Capability Level.
in v3.1 of the framework, we introduced “tracked capability levels (tcls).” tcls are meant to capture significant risks that may manifest at a lower capability threshold than our ccls.
Google DeepMind · Read the source - ASL: AI Safety Level
- A graded set of safety and security measures that become stricter as model capabilities increase.
we use AI Safety Level Standards (ASL Standards), graduated sets of safety and security measures that become more stringent as model capabilities increase.
Anthropic · Read the source
Not listed: 96 more stored statements that do not, on their own, state a level for one model version (for example a definition of a level, a sentence about another model, or text damaged in our copy of the document).
A row is one model version, one domain and one level. The 138 rows quote 121 different sentences. We count a sentence once by its exact text, even where it fills several rows or appears under several versions. 8 stored rows state a level already listed for the same version and domain under another name or in another sentence; each is listed under that row and not counted again.
Some documents we hold are stored in lower case only, so their quotes are shown in lower case. The source link opens the original.