Levels crossed

We cannot rule out that Gemini 4 Argon reaches the cybersecurity CCL.

despite claude opus 5.5’s cyber capabilities, the model still falls within the lower category of capabilities set out in our frontier compliance framework (fcf), and we do not see indications that the model is capable of novel offensive capability.

despite claude opus 5.5’s cyber capabilities, the model still falls within the lower category of capabilities set out in our frontier compliance framework (fcf), and we do not see indications that the model is capable of novel offensive capability.

the results indicate that neither gpt-image-2.5-sunburst nor gpt-image- 2.5-flare cross the bio high threshold or the cyber high threshold.

based on our evaluations, we believe that astra meets the critical cybersecurity threshold.

although mythos 5.1 is in tier 1, it is getting closer to tier 2, completing more and more autonomous tasks.

gemini 3.7 flash reaches the alert threshold for this ccl, but not the ccl.

chem/bio: moderate or lower risk; cyber: moderate or lower risk (inferred); loss of control: moderate or lower risk (inferred).

- cyber: moderate or lower risk (inferred);

our assessments indicate that, when evaluated without mitigations applied, we cannot rule out muse spark 1.1’s capabilities meeting this threshold in both the chemical & biological and cybersecurity domains.

therefore, we conclude that we have addressed these risks from unmitigated muse spark 1.1, which bring the residual risk to the “moderate or lower” risk threshold under advanced ai scaling framework.

we assess cybersecurity risk as “moderate or lower” with respect to the threat scenarios outlined in meta’s advanced ai scaling framework.

muse spark’s offensive cyber capabilities remain below the level required to meaningfully enable the cyber threat scenarios defined in the advanced ai scaling framework.

we assess cybersecurity risk as “moderate or lower” with respect to the threat scenarios outlined in meta’s advanced ai scaling framework.

this is the first instant model that we are treating as high capability in our cybersecurity and biological & chemical preparedness categories, and implementing appropriate safeguards.

we therefore treat vulnlmp as important evidence that gpt-5.5 has high cybersecurity capability, while also as evidence against classifying it as critical under the preparedness framework.

we are treating gpt-5.5 as high capability in the cybersecurity domain, but below critical.