Levels crossed

Which provider statements say a capability level was crossed, not crossed or not determined?

138 rows, one per model version, domain and level; 8 match the choice below. Grouped by model, newest first.

Gemini 4 Argon Google DeepMind

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · TCL (Tracked Capability Level) · Not determined
In light of this, we assess that we cannot rule out the TCL.
Google DeepMind · 13 October 2026 · Read the source

Muse Glimmer 30B Meta · August 2026

2 statements · not determined 2

Autonomy & replication · Moderate or lower · Not determined
Chem/Bio: Moderate or lower risk; Cyber: Moderate or lower risk (inferred); Loss of Control: Moderate or lower risk (inferred).
Meta · August 2026 · Read the source
Autonomy & replication · Moderate or lower risk (inferred) · Not determined
- Loss of Control: Moderate or lower risk (inferred).
Meta · August 2026 · Read the source

GPT-Rosalind-5.5 OpenAI · 3 June 2026

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · High · Not determined
Because GPT- Rosalind-5.5 was trained on additional biology data unrelated to AI self-improvement, we rely on GPT-5.5’s existing Preparedness assessment for AI Self-Improvement, where GPT-5.5 did not meet the threshold for High capability.
OpenAI · 3 June 2026 · Read the source

Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · ASL-4 · Not determined
For AI R&D capabilities, we found that Claude Opus 4.6 has saturated most of our automated evaluations, meaning they no longer provide useful evidence for ruling out ASL-4 level autonomy.
Anthropic · 5 February 2026 · Read the source

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · ASL-3 · Not determined
Exhibited improved autonomy capabilities in software engineering and AI research tasks, though still below the ASL-4 rule-out threshold.
Anthropic · September 2025 · Read the source

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · Machine Learning R&D Uplift Level 1 · Not determined
given Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview's poor median performance on RE-Bench relative to experts, the model likely lacks the necessary capabilities to automate or significantly uplift any significant fraction of the research process.
Google DeepMind · 27 June 2025 · Read the source

Claude Sonnet 3.7 Anthropic

1 statement · not determined 1

Autonomy & replication · ASL-4 · Not determined
These problems are harder to solve than the previous problems and we consider them as part of our ASL-4 evaluations.
Anthropic · February 2025 · Read the source

Abbreviations in these level names

TCL: Tracked Capability Level: A capability level for significant risks that may appear at a lower capability than a Critical Capability Level.
in v3.1 of the framework, we introduced “tracked capability levels (tcls).” tcls are meant to capture significant risks that may manifest at a lower capability threshold than our ccls.
Google DeepMind · Read the source
ASL: AI Safety Level: A graded set of safety and security measures that become stricter as model capabilities increase.
we use AI Safety Level Standards (ASL Standards), graduated sets of safety and security measures that become more stringent as model capabilities increase.
Anthropic · Read the source

Not listed: 96 more stored statements that do not, on their own, state a level for one model version (for example a definition of a level, a sentence about another model, or text damaged in our copy of the document).

A row is one model version, one domain and one level. The 138 rows quote 121 different sentences. We count a sentence once by its exact text, even where it fills several rows or appears under several versions. 8 stored rows state a level already listed for the same version and domain under another name or in another sentence; each is listed under that row and not counted again.