Cases › copyright or IP violation › LR-2026-0837
Gemini chatbot summary of Hungarian news article alleged to infringe press publishers' right (Like Company v Google, C-250/25)
Preliminary Why: Publisher not yet named · subject to change
Status: no action reported
No source states: loss or records, deployer.
Severity minor: A single publisher's copyrighted content is alleged to have been reproduced, a bounded scope stated, with no loss figure given.
Like Company Kft., a Hungarian operator of advertising-funded news portals, sued Google before the Budapest Regional Court, alleging that Bard and then Gemini infringed its press publishers' right between 13 June 2023 and 31 May 2024. Its example: a user asked Gemini to summarise a balatonkornyeke.hu article about a singer's plan to bring dolphins to Lake Balaton, and the answer described a pool of specific dimensions and public criticism that the source did not contain, which Google called hallucinations of the LLM. The Hungarian court referred questions to the Court of Justice. On 3 November 2026 Advocate General Szpunar advised that retrieval-based chatbot answers can infringe where access circumvents a paywall or bot block, or where the answer recognisably substitutes for the article, but that Like Company's own example probably does not meet that test.
What happened
No source tells the story step by step yet.
What was done
No source states an action or fix.
Risks
Primary11 incidents
Sorted by rule from the case's fields; not yet read from the sources.
Controls
Not yet read for controls. Controls that mitigate the primary risk:
ModelCopyright safeguards · Marking machine-made output
ApplicationSimilar incidents
Evidence
- Legal action a case filed
No source states: a step-by-step account, when it happened, when it was found, how many records were exposed, the direct loss, a count of the other parties affected, the cause, what set it off, what was done.
Show every field, with its source and grade
The AI system
What happened
Impact
Context
Notes on gaps
The article reports third-party traffic studies (39.8% click decline; Web Search share falling from 51.10% to 27.42%) but these are not tied to this incident and are not entered. The document also mentions unrelated matters (GEMA v OpenAI, GEMA v Suno, CNN v Perplexity, Wikimedia's filing, the Commission's antitrust probe, the DSA designation of ChatGPT) which are referenced as context or precedent, not described as incidents in this document, and are not extracted. Extractor proposed values without quotes; dropped: . The claim that Google used articles for training is Like Company's allegation, not an established finding. Extractor proposed values without quotes; dropped: .
LR-2026-0837 · version 1 · published 2026-11-04 after automatic checks; not yet checked field by field by a person · JSON