Cases › copyright or IP violation › LR-2026-0396
Attempted model extraction of Google Gemini through more than 100,000 prompts
Preliminary Why: 1 report: Ars Technica · subject to change · 1 independent report
Status: fix reported
No source states: loss or records, agent tool, could do, deployer, industry.
Google's Gemini AI chatbot was the target of attempts to clone its knowledge by prompting it, with the activity attributed to commercially motivated actors. One adversarial session reportedly prompted the model more than 100,000 times across various non-English languages, collecting responses ostensibly to train a cheaper copycat. The chatbot responds to anyone online, which the attackers exploited through repeated queries. Google's internal security teams flagged the activity, and it was linked to actors seeking rival models by copying core behaviour patterns. Once identified, offending accounts were blocked and new safeguards were implemented to limit how much sensitive reasoning information can be inferred through repeated queries. Google describes the activity as model extraction and considers it intellectual property theft, a position the source calls somewhat loaded.
What happened
What was done
“Offending accounts blocked and new safeguards implemented to limit sensitive reasoning information inferred through repeated queries”
Same developer, same risk, after the fix: LR-2026-0222
Risks
Primary7 incidents
Sorted by rule from the case's fields; not yet read from the sources.
Controls
Not yet read for controls. Controls that mitigate the primary risk:
ModelCopyright safeguards · Marking machine-made output
ApplicationSimilar incidents
Evidence
No source states: what went wrong, what it reached or did, when it happened, when it was found, how many records were exposed, the direct loss, a count of the other parties affected, any court case, the cause, what set it off.
Show the full account: 2 items from the primary sources
What happened, in order
Not dated in the sources:
- Google Threat Intelligence Group flagged the extraction activity.
- Offending accounts were blocked and new safeguards were implemented.
Show every field, with its source and grade
The AI system
What happened
Impact
Notes on gaps
The specific safeguards added are not described, so no preventive control is credited.
LR-2026-0396 · version 1 · published 2026-11-01 after automatic checks; not yet checked field by field by a person · JSON