AI Risk Wire

Cases › biased or discriminatory › LR-2026-0431

Facial recognition error prompts police to arrest Asian man for burglary

Preliminary Why: 1 report: The Guardian · subject to change · 1 independent report

Status: no action reported

Severity moderate
Reported 25 Feb 2026
Developer and model Cognitec

No source states: loss or records, agent tool, could do, deployer, industry.

Severity moderate: Test: data or systems of others touched, with a bounded scope stated. Fact: live scanning captured about 100,000 faces across five named locations. No count of two or more affected third parties is stated, so not major.

UK police used facial recognition software, supplied by Cognitec through the Home Office, to match CCTV footage of a burglary suspect against police mugshots. The software matched Alvi Choudhury, a software engineer in Southampton, to a suspect in Milton Keynes about 100 miles away. Thames Valley police arrested him in January and held him in custody for nearly 10 hours before releasing him. Home Office research had earlier found far higher false-positive rates for Black and Asian faces at certain settings. Thames Valley police said the arrest followed a human visual assessment and denied it was unlawful. Choudhury is claiming damages. The Home Office said guidance and training were under review, and a new, independently tested national system is in development.

What happened

No source tells the story step by step yet.

What was done

No source states an action or fix.

Risks

Read from the sources; not yet reviewed by a person.

Controls

Not yet read for controls. Controls that mitigate the primary risk:

Application

Bias testing · Risk assessment per deployment · Output filtering and redaction

Similar incidents

All cases of this kind ›

Evidence

No source states: a step-by-step account, when it happened, when it was found, how many records were exposed, the direct loss, a count of the other parties affected, any court case, the cause, what set it off, what was done.

Show the full account: 4 items from the primary sources

What happened, in order

  1. 2021 Choudhury was wrongly arrested in 2021 and his mugshot was retained on the police system.
  2. January Police arrested Choudhury at his home in Southampton and held him in custody for nearly 10 hours.
  3. December The technology was revealed to produce a far higher false-positive rate for black and Asian faces at certain settings.

Not dated in the sources:

  • Thames Valley police admitted to Choudhury that the arrest may have been the result of bias in the facial recognition technology.
Show every field, with its source and grade

The AI system

Developer
Cognitec
C one secondary source states it

What happened

Earliest source we hold
2026-02-25
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown
What went wrong
biased or discriminatory
C one secondary source states it
primary risk
RK16
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown

Impact

Severity
moderate
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown
Why this severity
Test: data or systems of others touched, with a bounded scope stated. Fact: live scanning captured about 100,000 faces across five named locations. No count of two or more affected third parties is stated, so not major.
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown

Context

Country
United Kingdom
C one secondary source states it

Notes on gaps

Choudhury's claims that bias or the officer's motive caused the arrest are his allegations, and the police deny racial profiling, so they are not recorded as findings.

LR-2026-0431 · version 1 · published 2026-11-01 after automatic checks; not yet checked field by field by a person · JSON