AI Risk Wire

Cases › physical harm › LR-2026-0317

Figure AI whistleblower lawsuit alleges humanoid robots could fracture skulls

Preliminary Why: 1 report: CNBC · subject to change · 1 independent report

Status: no action reported

Severity minor
Reported 21 Nov 2025
Developer and model Figure AI

No source states: loss or records, agent tool, could do, deployer, industry.

Severity minor: Test: minor (contained to one deployer or one evaluation, no third party touched). Fact: the only physical effect stated is a gash in a steel refrigerator door during one malfunction, and no third party is stated to be affected.

Figure AI, a developer of humanoid robots, was sued in a federal court in California by its former principal robotic safety engineer, Robert Gruendel. He alleges that he warned executives the robots were powerful enough to fracture a human skull, and cited a robot that carved a gash into a steel refrigerator door during a malfunction. He says he was fired in September, days after lodging safety complaints, and that he had warned against downgrading a safety roadmap shown to prospective investors. Figure says he was terminated for poor performance and that the allegations are falsehoods it will discredit in court. Gruendel seeks economic, compensatory and punitive damages. The sources report no injury to any person, and the claims remain unproven allegations.

What happened

1 · What it reached or didHe says he was fired in September, days after his most direct and documented safety complaints.

What was done

No source states an action or fix.

Risks

Sorted by rule from the case's fields; not yet read from the sources.

Controls

Not yet read for controls. Controls that mitigate the primary risk:

Harness

Stop control

Application

Physical safety interlocks · Human approval for high-impact actions · Live behaviour monitoring · Adversarial testing before deployment

Evidence

No source states: what the AI was doing, what went wrong, how it was caught, when it happened, when it was found, how many records were exposed, the direct loss, a count of the other parties affected, any court case, the cause, what set it off, what was done.

Show the full account: 1 items from the primary sources

What happened, in order

  1. September Gruendel was fired, days after lodging his safety complaints.
Show every field, with its source and grade

The AI system

Developer
Figure AI
C one secondary source states it

What happened

Earliest source we hold
2025-11-21
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown
What went wrong
physical harm
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown

Impact

Severity
minor
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown
Why this severity
Test: minor (contained to one deployer or one evaluation, no third party touched). Fact: the only physical effect stated is a gash in a steel refrigerator door during one malfunction, and no third party is stated to be affected.
D inferred by us from the described behaviour, reason shown

Context

Country
United States
C one secondary source states it

Notes on gaps

No model, version, harness, tools, controls or remediation are stated, so those fields and the links list are empty. The sources do not say whether any safety plan was actually changed, only what the plaintiff alleges.

LR-2026-0317 · version 1 · published 2026-11-01 after automatic checks; not yet checked field by field by a person · JSON